why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAYW4KV2KX7KK3S525T6U2MIRIRJYCQJK7AQ3JLX2C4CUOB6ZYMTPGVA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9a0364e395a3d05ea8c3eb61a08d2d625ab90c344ce3b2c9f63e04058fb2649e
- request
- 655155995ccdfbcec5729a9c17443d705b9a7dcbe2c571ff2eb037d0f78f9cfc
- transaction
- d8c26003673a20b6608a3a071193b591383300c11e13beeb3d9ab354aa2b4a06computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 62216
the chainentry 62216
- sealed to the entry before
- f3b1aa07e3cf419b31f90cd8309df964919d3fd6fb44168c188993672ebe499e
- this leaf
- 01263f3e11c0de0efe1fb3b74930cb138e6c32ce0c1e2f0f9e4727f30ce28257
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- MVzW5LI1H/53VzsU/5obXwGYPYP5oHc34v7M2IS0s35CzBF2r37sdJQBqDOnoi/oYFgmgL8PlsW60dxtxs7RAQ==