why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBEQIYW3IDJYBXJDEFI2DXLZW5HEM3YQXVA3KSIFYX5B2P3EFPCB5IYX, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBEQIYW3IDJYBXJDEFI2DXLZW5HEM3YQXVA3KSIFYX5B2P3EFPCB5IYX is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 39bbef9f693fcbe5f667e09ff0918f4cc701e4883f87bcd74fd47061c2fc1a9e
- request
- 69e5c1e499229a926497f8c4d8d0748315ad42ce510e5613ab8edea9af9ee6f5
- transaction
- af189a911aa4b6d72667b726d08fcfb7813ff5043fbba209dc1f6efc45488776computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 23233
the chainentry 23233
- sealed to the entry before
- 93928e75348c342d36cde219dd29b3951e1b47ac4818cbf63871b28f15ad1b7c
- this leaf
- 014d54f10fc612a0ed93b5a0088afe02e314bf6876f787e003d9184112034c43
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- kRheLaALBUbHS4u+fA2V7WPTkzX/mf9bSjDYmCz95gBvvDwet/NCQImxAFMnOpnGCRo5/TkYYvzNBxzT3FlMCg==