why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBL6Q6THDPD5MRSRTPF3CC2BOFZHYD55LBZFLV4XVHHBSLF5YEDZJEMB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 6e8ec71e4fa78633c5b548e7a22439a1296fffb7ac3f524d47047e9317e2fd3b
- request
- 61e9cf01b991f4da358b8ac82e23b95d56aa985b5cbb70b5305f309fdffb4971
- transaction
- 3ac21a65cb9185cec1c6d135d182ffd506ef831bef64273aff95af357ca33acfcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 12971
the chainentry 12971
- sealed to the entry before
- 1427fffc1c90adb4e98334f223d2da08aa365cfd9cffe9ca3be95bc2c0da94af
- this leaf
- 0169e8a2ce477370cee84c4ee07bd5e05a632096a13a32380b66159a0b924375
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- fTzmMiH53k2TT8r4O/dtsWFD2zP0QumT3Nl/oiUFmgGIhZVSZQ7yTjAWNKBckwUqN2B5QfAPZv6ABR2mz+GYBQ==