why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBGVDLPDRYPQVAKAJXBBFXZ4ACF6TYTN7H2K27ZJ6GYRHJDEDFFOEA2M, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBGVDLPDRYPQVAKAJXBBFXZ4ACF6TYTN7H2K27ZJ6GYRHJDEDFFOEA2M is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 948501f0a7bfc7ebca1ade0e8a861531c2558d92249dc74d7fdab3602bd7f910
- request
- 7a7b9b18638903381df8df3b8482a9271890884470b0e66c70c545f8aaa50ad2
- transaction
- fc9f8d815ccd5f146b42b6c477c21a8f6b272435333490950612e462947da4f3computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 47932
the chainentry 47932
- sealed to the entry before
- e1cce32d3249b2f0307f9fedacc9177690b6539477d7836c3c47e897c0c538e2
- this leaf
- 02b4e742a833f46bdd2206690978bd3d6678dc024c2415e70670810bcbb0cb16
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- CkP/bVlTUr+DzvLnTkqhDJW2uY6ZA7b3cLUtZ5MnS//kKKxUITYpPoY0WFwtYqHUOdwjCuldgjntX5fUEvkEAQ==