livelog 33,652 entries · root df936bc770b0 · read 13:58:30
the record/entry 33524
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDLYGHFHQUKLD6OKWWBQGMULU325PBNBLTCDJBCFXCE5UT5KJUXNY2UO to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.735ms2026-09-03 11:32:34
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDLYGHFHQUKLD6OKWWBQGMULU325PBNBLTCDJBCFXCE5UT5KJUXNY2UO to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
9350c73fd30acec7d43cba123f7a2b37d4b0483dd28349bee7ff496b6caa7872
request
48913846644bf196025abad92f5cdca0380f03efbab569f6ec1a78014b1d0eed
transaction
0d99d704c8eead34f66bd8b346ac746dd15401d072831fa274665fb900451ab1
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 33524
recomputing…
the chainentry 33524
sealed to the entry before
2dacfb84f350078fc2e3c747088cf56b53e7961466a553d3f2ffba5ca218bd6a
this leaf
0361c0c46603b91eb55e3de98f848548b7870ca056bf6848c9324b6ca67bfbde
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
/wR7ZMQV/c+wBdh/nTiSGQzGn8e7ZPqnFq1mXTolnKQz5vd88c2k/pWs8E/GW4oquOL9vY1rR7WoSY8dm1IMCA==