why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBYZZWV4MUQD2NK2IJQSYL5SQUXRSGUUVLS46JAQHKSQRU6YQFXZ7CRJ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 528934284c10a45be85235ed791b7b798a946602c2c2fe0513f5a0ddf62c8e25
- request
- 04e8a736647b07d7fd1dadf02efce336d8b93e2a5aec9a0092d977e4b251a423
- transaction
- 215d6482898125b4fcc7d9af1622305572d518827bb7bc1bd5ab9966e1865c4fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7925
the chainentry 7925
- sealed to the entry before
- be9ebfe1d259feee9cb5d7ed6738d9d56be1ab2570fe731045d53b1a9b9e69a2
- this leaf
- 03d53c8593b0dfb8608b2c914828c7bd1241bca9ee0600eb1975ca7b691278e9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Dp+30CuHXTMHckESbHwZGqz06gXXEMzzTpK/E+ZUBL1sfUYC17E22I9fGV7lBRZL3NrhhuUukdN64HB1BoIIBQ==