why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GC4EBU2UEXL2MVN4IRQMBUW4YSDHQOYKZZ35B4NF3SFZ76AP5B7JTVPD to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- de048ac6b12beee9368f0981d02cb09fbd36cde12d9fa0849654eaecd9cc03c8
- request
- 6d7ecc2c6b69ff55c0a23ee3d5e6673d08c7ff542e635fb30f87598d7c166334
- transaction
- c679416348a2b1c65f61b0e11016de00de91114bc6d3dbc00c93de759b1b5aa4computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 20288
the chainentry 20288
- sealed to the entry before
- 0f231dca2f9f08830a52c26c87a4bc7818357ba9576296d52910e90adfd72d3f
- this leaf
- 043b222de76d761ab861d0c31805d4832f46a35841840309e5c8fcc793358473
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- XjTZduFBYGAdbIXYeO0U+lf9FUQ7MnBnZPSrE7mRyDrHkJ0FMlTSfxlaMrRRkAQ1kJSQBVnbdsz317p4cvsLBA==