why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDJGLGQK6MLV4SWPSAJKNDWPGI3P6CDIFTFG7CLV45KKCBKZO4UZJ5MQ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 78d2ce827ebf3201bc2cf020f624ac8f62808a939c870fc5a81c2c4e7f04946e
- request
- a35d9695a69f63cef0bd0db44705285d80fe43f49951114995885a77288ddd7c
- transaction
- 621d8f642fa62e9f5093d0a0981fe416e758a0fcf2d6c20de29dfa7ab10605e1computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 21448
the chainentry 21448
- sealed to the entry before
- 8afbf9c7ede9292c1bcf9488123475836d19778011c37d7afeab72395103fbaf
- this leaf
- 04b358e4f132ca83cb6e48e169d26432ee9ef09ab62d737ac41376481e324ea1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Pt4jqd8Jt6a+ZkYvLBYj+lpSPYRJFVvT4Npp0PZ9odstdaXdflyFt/be8uUl49z+K6LtLDXs2cjo3Aa5xUKtCQ==