livelog 22,265 entries · root 1e427039c114 · read 19:42:47
the record/entry 20949
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDWO65O3QZBFXEAXRIDMCHGIPPGZC77VLFS2QPJNSEOSAWRAK7GTDE7B to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent
decided in 7.115ms2026-08-24 18:47:42
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDWO65O3QZBFXEAXRIDMCHGIPPGZC77VLFS2QPJNSEOSAWRAK7GTDE7B to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
d3c9b196e0153913e9369efdd0df4365dc880b59ffa285d40ec5660499b6b906
request
b10c7a70753cc0d30dbf1ce778790938c9baae8d643d010770e4fb23efed32cd
transaction
fc4132c81aa6c638b6b856a5d0d9fa142b44cbdc48133c1e10a2206b00e10924
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 20949
recomputing…
the chainentry 20949
sealed to the entry before
27586ad1a5e2f4ba8873cb676cd2ba6f8f57ea1cae56ec846b03dacf9ebe9aea
this leaf
04b609c234768853f94116ab50f1ae7b319c3628525bee099a604895b56ddf87
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
TcQFJnU8xUD7Ang7m+mm3xMYAnDLZFjawe5Pq9ypErV7VRyPo7La9w8tursJXQem78xxHO1c/la3nbCRgybADw==