why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCJI4PSIFE65P3AOWFZZCDHCWQ766NRN4AQ7I7KQAAKVL27Y2C2LJ65N, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCJI4PSIFE65P3AOWFZZCDHCWQ766NRN4AQ7I7KQAAKVL27Y2C2LJ65N is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- fc58d175f288cd9efcc9202fb4dc6ff72a4a66ba339e55ae021148c23a1a8898
- request
- b2a9ddc7e3354d1e196049e68da1be72f1c0ad2fb4cfe34594036edc8a713ae6
- transaction
- ad7852168c8236ce395c6f8a5acd454ac923ab412996fd215a78e2e2b357e9a2computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 15729
the chainentry 15729
- sealed to the entry before
- dd52ce4313f3f11a926a2ee7599775dc27d99f55fff6894823b37bcfbfe17297
- this leaf
- 04d9b193dfa852452bd9af7d14e2280b7b8274b55c320c3d3694aa56122f5d21
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- K25OwxanRs64HmwWwUZovuMeuvm+8YV9pcMF31dLAQFPcD2YfU0YSEl7ifMm+Wc4cZuVVUZQZItPIA7nFq60Cg==