why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCUGZGB3Y6Y4IMKL25E6MJ5UU6P2DT67QIJCMRTR23MRX7GHSXOK3K2J to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 32a51e386a3eb63f45dc636435b295d193c4b9ed02d718625e034a863674a5a4
- request
- 014f2210dfc976a045135f23c71fbf4dcb9e9ee98502a5aea5b5e05e4c851e5e
- transaction
- ac20c1135b46d1db986e1783d802116b84c9ef70727fb850103bc5c775104cb2computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 54415
the chainentry 54415
- sealed to the entry before
- 93aeaa1dcdb8846164f9372220acce4d0ef7059fac72210ab62a8364aa54f170
- this leaf
- 04ebfd8a97eef6ee8397564384906fb56f4b72d9d53c2fa3900d87569950fe09
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 2cBPQt2TuoC4Ya+bdeH5cawNDwmsW/snK25wqSWfpxQgWNHmPdLWxIyedEjrRuq5nR7cbgnJi5nzDCX2yspWBg==