why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBFHOPHAU4UKQJ3QMDADZBCIVTKS4CGHTY2SFMXFPINGTKWJCKSWHIQE, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBFHOPHAU4UKQJ3QMDADZBCIVTKS4CGHTY2SFMXFPINGTKWJCKSWHIQE is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 09373edd19f9f4da1846598fd9089c09c25d7a7fe61c0c1bfff3fe185d382176
- request
- 00ada79190797d9f16d35f99129749c80982ce78b5fec9926ef47c80736b9d05
- transaction
- 2866ea44e5e71e93356eaa580c59eb397a6a0ef230325de4a44736ea94d73ce6computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 63772
the chainentry 63772
- sealed to the entry before
- e7f29fc3d1be6628656ad5eb860a84b0117a98709e2ca5dec0725324a3958fca
- this leaf
- 051950bc2af137b29af72f36dee94018bf13495af2bcb0914835502559b59248
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 0Mq7nsiCYisXoWtDJfhGgXnsTE0qEes50usO42gMTpbh4mwugIdGsnCFgicwt7jydm5auRV4l5Na3T+yoI0cDw==