livelog 10,451 entries · root 768e5da5d729 · read 15:07:51
the record/entry 10277
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GATIPGTIHNTLST5CE3SBTUCLGLABGEGBFXV3HDJUUUNTYGJ3VL6DWPRP to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.354ms2026-08-16 12:02:29
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GATIPGTIHNTLST5CE3SBTUCLGLABGEGBFXV3HDJUUUNTYGJ3VL6DWPRP to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
215380298fdd886318d3a2659cd42ef77f8d2aec52d533ac7ab1be542c43d828
request
34263674c58941f0e17dd02610fcf641e2206131787d1ae55c458c38a78c7528
transaction
97594a5287be567fc7eab22ef12a750e4133577ef010e7efc6851fe0521373a0
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 10277
recomputing…
the chainentry 10277
sealed to the entry before
6388a78146d88b7a675a6f37b93c9c78ef0e905357871430212a100fdd3b37c2
this leaf
0575a6c5c9550eae35f69055e63aff040b8fe76c6b53b0600e424bcbeefa289f
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
mZhYIhEsZwTRsPEN7XS2f9Y4JNIwFqVlIAld204Sq97KfgVu7IViVDv32T90uo5TD8GZyBcxzRmdP/eQxExsAA==