livelog 10,984 entries · root 1cf77a8f6197 · read 00:47:54
the record/entry 7449
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GB4L6JACUOYPTCXGHSKHEU6ARAXR5A4NOQE5US3NKMJQIZ4LJ2UJ2CRJ to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.104ms2026-08-14 06:37:26
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GB4L6JACUOYPTCXGHSKHEU6ARAXR5A4NOQE5US3NKMJQIZ4LJ2UJ2CRJ to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
b9c3aa3ffd016fc25f3cc1d26be8831d72088a1881238d27def6669adc11d567
request
92bdcfd10b764b04c918dc1597330e00cae92c716061377f3ef42fb2dad5c123
transaction
60a2c1f914900e2188eaa54e24fe97f94db95993570aff593b40c3d286d4ae3b
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7449
recomputing…
the chainentry 7449
sealed to the entry before
97ba113edf0357e135c82d5e35abca2aecac20f88ee6fa63b0dbe0f0c739d989
this leaf
0684a81815092915697f0c2f1ec85088dbf7395ff4099b2494b8a82c9daec804
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
18Vvhc/8jBe+r0+Zn4Yxf3rdisr7G9/fSfGgMIC963QFk+myr+XeHImOohN5thLyrDr9VQLyvNl7wNuSD6h/Dg==