why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBF4CTIMG5MJ4L3R56OGTHWYFG4RM3OB3CEKB4TEO2SFYVJMEPHLS3YD, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBF4CTIMG5MJ4L3R56OGTHWYFG4RM3OB3CEKB4TEO2SFYVJMEPHLS3YD is on the screening list: counterparty 0x0330070fd38ec3bb94f58fa55d40368271e9e54a is flagged by OFAC SDN. 0x0330070fd38ec3bb94f58fa55d40368271e9e54a is on the us treasury's specially designated nationals list (digital currency addresses, eth). source: ofac via the 0xB10C mirror, live copy from 2026-09-08.
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- bf6f202996280207fcee62fec2604460f6b1558ff5d1dd424d85b03a6a1b2316
- request
- fdafb548a765a19b602db4e4232ca59230cdaeb0536c0f1d78eda2e9ed2100c1
- transaction
- fd95e21b602109744171e5dc7590504722aa63fd8b499ef395edb341f557eb06computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50443
the chainentry 50443
- sealed to the entry before
- 04d15b2d983eb3f7d363e5e2be01c58e5155fe7cfc7dfa8187812788c07cd450
- this leaf
- 06c68ae81d24a552279d5a156969ae28a7943719a8cb4d1f7f424f606a81ac96
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- st9RtXxLVf2uXoJWyNA3k2ySySiJn1t92HtFQzmMFQdROB3R3rc2+aD95m/1q1sT6lJSsxG7cTqu/8JI6O11Bw==