why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB6XA3XVGFXIYKWZ52DS6KZVTIPVEKJJFVY4Q7NVMDOUZ7TEPAEES7BZ, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB6XA3XVGFXIYKWZ52DS6KZVTIPVEKJJFVY4Q7NVMDOUZ7TEPAEES7BZ is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 5c54c5fd37a2cf0744925e90cd5ab813c243bb90653c1a3d64e2a72501988624
- request
- 5b43cc5661da9bfe66c8804eff73bde8f95c2c8ac53f653ed56cf5f33499a313
- transaction
- 050c53b624364c3a8b7757e43ec16b4cb9a13452df9bfea6394a62cfd6f2749bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 33632
the chainentry 33632
- sealed to the entry before
- f1fc5fa9194be0bce71a4eab3be19dc040578fb75a5c58a9d1c93045482beee4
- this leaf
- 0743a77bd991848b26cfbc3ed39300a3405e4148c76e3550f461e2e9f7aedb73
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- yvCfCJ43/J+/TbHG7NGLOJKyWrltX0H8YCU6AfY/BEikYugqCn98jXRdN+NQLq7SN58vlJHm2FXbFYMwD/q0AQ==