why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GB5SWVM3XZUV5V4YMPMWMUOB5E4MMKFIMM4LH3IVMHYCIXN7EW4KSPJY to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 433363873ed0d517207eb6b3e5111f2fd1b1039d4546406a36f6ac43cc5fe2b9
- request
- 116f54484accf8afaf40ca15a44f57192c6ba640296519b4262e9e79a475bbe5
- transaction
- a02ca28ad433b67f09b9e73e7b43bb2225751b4c834334aad99648c92d54f6e5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 20812
the chainentry 20812
- sealed to the entry before
- aef08192c25a5abc7015330e016784b11513c2cff424fd2e63e5d68d1e189841
- this leaf
- 0760a841fb40c4115f6636b9dac2c833b9606060190e36f12bf39369117c62aa
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- fy7NTxj5zR8xkpAh8UpDaD95NFw7S3GGpLGW1V1QG9p9pmOTj7v+JstEhyRkFh6qks7Ge4Gwyw5ESUS6fWz3Bw==