why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDJ5VD4LHYF3R3ZDQ47I4WCHAXEASZDRTF4GLR6XTRKRGJSF24FLMYHW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 208d49ff14eb2707bb011e37cb0ec71b83f2d0a92a154abaf4bd76f5301b7cd0
- request
- 348abaeac5d58ba3c043663cf64cc50e7562545046d6bc01fd9d86fce9e2cd09
- transaction
- f4ecd43ce427e522caadc7e93cc82a4b453893d04be5e972b6b419375f4d40c6computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 69881
the chainentry 69881
- sealed to the entry before
- 858569d9c87c0463d54466041f5bab0d222dea5d9bf526043472b295778f32b0
- this leaf
- 07f5c8ac103de131e7f80506dd9d60de9ec4684c1f8015cf4d8f1cab161c81c9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- O8RH+YpExQ8z8AG7qCO5hwp13SW55/wkH2dvhYg0I9MTIy/blUpJd4sK5DR7goabO0XsVAEoUE5yCDrKPitsCw==