why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCOH6HNYINMQGT6T65LXSGL33VKID45SLG5ZA4ZOCOXMRCKS7IU6INGZ, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCOH6HNYINMQGT6T65LXSGL33VKID45SLG5ZA4ZOCOXMRCKS7IU6INGZ is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- fc1bd72a971146fba9f50955d6e4e32e3f7faf4b408aed43fdd60602740edc25
- request
- 81e1d948575c5f9e3b1cf0e2cc06a41ac47ec038cefd6a6a3c211c7851b9d9d3
- transaction
- 1a125b34c8c265a3bdc83280c58971da1aaa1c5048aaf9c294a25092796236cdcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 949
the chainentry 949
- sealed to the entry before
- ec97c9016713e62331ac908fe3ae78d093dd5177c1952bd57f793e5448047db4
- this leaf
- 080530ca1cdb897b6c0d6a3184317b2f958cd232adabfe6bb4077ccc20486535
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Fpt8v953JlOvU+VkHGoYtNKdwvlCpQyEGMLrx8bK6GK2e3ILZ/zVSy8JkjEh+Mq2Eg3gGr1gnBkPf3G6xo0OCg==