why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBV3EFK7JDBNB7MN7L6E3W6PWRQIJ3ALIKKMF74VAQ3OVK7APZTFCVKO, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBV3EFK7JDBNB7MN7L6E3W6PWRQIJ3ALIKKMF74VAQ3OVK7APZTFCVKO is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 329540dd9830b0eb53c6d939a0b1d442f9bfaa77c9c6bb0d5ba60d630447f31c
- request
- 8223857a0727972b825e71d8e16c8950c35c753aa62b0ee92452ac4ba8aca805
- transaction
- 79e1aa94e8e15b4eba93caf871bdacdda19db1bbc62b6cbf5f7266d05655e6d1computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 40297
the chainentry 40297
- sealed to the entry before
- 4fe23cb2d842e14cb8ba196fe5f12e7dd54ffd959e3b59f3e0b38761fb0a326e
- this leaf
- 083cf3f7ebdeec48325d9c7080b00e33b24227cf223a4dec239c202f55faabb8
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Z4R+s3TuNWbe7mfjlejo6h9PqdZ/Hfz0cEqNLP2nlybTG75dn/i4rHbG9ppSZGeGSJKrvkxdSEl7TGxsywVJAQ==