why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC4TMNWHAWEJE2XV5RZ342XE3YZT4BUQGFKJ6RKNUM3UIVPJNH26JENY, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC4TMNWHAWEJE2XV5RZ342XE3YZT4BUQGFKJ6RKNUM3UIVPJNH26JENY is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 859b94b1d7e7ccde9c01d6431f2fe7903d3e3c4d0881988cc39d6e4701b57235
- request
- 4d8becaa2db7079302d2e30d1cfe39502dbbf4a02b53d602a871462153924ed7
- transaction
- cb1c2a4ead5fd557cc3016a82e547aec2f0f8352c8a04e69008ae08eaf73bdb6computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 1976
the chainentry 1976
- sealed to the entry before
- 2c31f101c2903e19113b08f0fc6868c2bd5d3fbc737666b40f29426348f356c2
- this leaf
- 08bc44f8977bd8b285021deb17e30086f2a38add9539a86bc4c647227332d2fd
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Osi+Yaz2mxBy4RUnYHA6xTJ2/HmzvgWvE4E7w0YiCa6Sk7xVFopQJT8dyM1OhSUJM0g76zTSrWXzXx0Yuq0LAA==