why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAYDJIUP3HNYHEAAJJEHZNK22V4ASK6KIAUVEQRFZWFF57XN3XIDE3VK, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- efb17e57824f1791c7dd4abdea40bff4fe43341c6bc5cd6463a4e6a4c7a37a6d
- request
- 4df772a51cd5ed459f5f439bc4ca13b01ee912038faa5a352c03564dcf5916ed
- transaction
- e9976e2bf34adafb50ddc85182bffb0c2dffbcd10f2be6c6fcef99993413802fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56275
the chainentry 56275
- sealed to the entry before
- f11bcc68737041e420b9f37277840fec77d5fd8c3cf625c7a5eb63523a5722b8
- this leaf
- 09950cf0e65eebfeeb6112815b55fe4afb3f98c97421ce8153f095e068847841
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- ebmFJyPCvZl88rwYUEpazgUJSZbSJW7lZh5vYCsS3AxK2HMSBiBGsgYrieSfN979GB8+OO7JXRYQ59G+mpN2CA==