why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GD3VA3VCOK73J3RKVAHJ5CQBK5I24OJQJWGANG2WOEACJMKG5XY2TT2U, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- deef37040d6f6651f8c5976f344d6c367699eb5aa14d177f94859df4b491993f
- request
- 0724c4c1d41e51b63838997ff5832bcfa2a7cbed0abd26dce159d2c4e857f880
- transaction
- 445fdd02ea064117b18edba0d06ff62c430f26c3c88ff4f4e70751dac46c18aecomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57269
the chainentry 57269
- sealed to the entry before
- 11d543a927b493097f4b851e71fb6a3318924a270a7bc3efe46994932a40863f
- this leaf
- 09e0145cf18cf8646fe13c269d43de4641f9093ae9f65fe53fe9ef17efc58ea3
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Eouiyu5KKC5ePeGedM12QYwih8LepShS7BAQBpchyNyaEOOlXsXlvaLYn5EAgfK5LZlVmCsY7Ko6Zn0hJQ0+Ag==