why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBNUSNR4HDHDBQ5BZ76MV632C7XBC7NU7BVCHKMFVLPLX2JYFG4VGFY5, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBNUSNR4HDHDBQ5BZ76MV632C7XBC7NU7BVCHKMFVLPLX2JYFG4VGFY5 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a40d8abe3386a35755efaa48361344bb65351a3768a8536a535bc55d4837c11e
- request
- a0587eb17fe432e143003fe5d99293087732cd2f8978b614473ec44db665e24e
- transaction
- ae15c129530ccf42f5f703503d57f7af8cb11d69e6a9c7c1bfd8fce41008d378computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 552
the chainentry 552
- sealed to the entry before
- 886ef0d94cae5d3163761ca3aeb4d0ff48c8f0d25d3ca4b79c4f1db7285007bc
- this leaf
- 0a032216b1739d544f40ebd30a9b37aef76bbd38ef6e044e972cbe364f2c131d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- hphdhvVFFYCJnDPz3BNPPDIKsuapXnIh0/o58auMqFoPIyqczvXWoL0bLDJHeD9st825LgW4ndjzsy3CZXdiCA==