why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBNJQBGGWSRGOKV4GJK34G7VBHV74W4PLLGWTDYHPPEG4Z2DN4AK242U, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBNJQBGGWSRGOKV4GJK34G7VBHV74W4PLLGWTDYHPPEG4Z2DN4AK242U is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d4faad0a0860d99067a7746e874f9aa744d7947f98063f8b9d219c791570a224
- request
- e1ae4cf7a425c2df11bbf07bf92598f648d16aa445e6beffdc328b426378e11b
- transaction
- b48e7bfa60ab1866ef50f460c7b147b278710580fc17ad60728bb278e5bb62cecomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 68124
the chainentry 68124
- sealed to the entry before
- 81cdf17d2e3023b5c27351b5aaecb4c8d8141fb6e122b943a18e4f50c1fd75f7
- this leaf
- 0b2862a1d09172be84714fad9dde3f188bc016721053ba6a0a7941e20baff5cc
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- q1uQjI0WGwRvGHamp6+N9wlgzQ/V/GzEQxGoA38kr1Ai0nAL4NeWGtJO8Mkxlk4QATkZ0Mf09zYdcwpvb+c1Dw==