livelog 11,198 entries · root 80333e9f9673 · read 04:52:46
the record/entry 11047
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDORAQXW56RU4YKD7LP4IWZIQ3JRVOHU7QO4KFFQ4JVE5A2VEUFDI6DC to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.564ms2026-08-17 01:52:30
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDORAQXW56RU4YKD7LP4IWZIQ3JRVOHU7QO4KFFQ4JVE5A2VEUFDI6DC to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
d3a8602376e8a8c656796457412b2f2f98a1f8ef7b2d900f3dd6c7cf1ddb1779
request
298c9d8d58c2f923929791a1663ab5b89709631a9704c0421463637c2408ba58
transaction
added2a96d2c4ccce831012d729b72bf192692c5ad5e3fa2ccdd5aa8d1fcd45c
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 11047
recomputing…
the chainentry 11047
sealed to the entry before
a08296fd3bb968b5d97ed1c194e4ffb3cf7331d7baf2ab76006544e09ba83f55
this leaf
0bb32cf65b0798007f753cf7f1ef2473552b88a1e9ace15ea9f26a9726f6d252
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
lw369loKgIAsTGcdmYVbSSsLCMNxefRaMmUBDWudABKUJvpcNHX3HWSkv34IOtfzNQApCOPs1xplIkBvxm1GDg==