livelog 31,141 entries · root c89d7ee3d54b · read 15:42:37
the record/entry 30078
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GARWH47CR5NN2KB7NFMWCVOJDTHJBOSYHO4TAATJ5TDDBLAI773HZBIM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.592ms2026-08-31 19:52:36
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GARWH47CR5NN2KB7NFMWCVOJDTHJBOSYHO4TAATJ5TDDBLAI773HZBIM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
2daf1295adfe10bb2d6956ff1aa5120ebe5f1881457762677e115f9bb8137af7
request
045a0a04af3bc05bff5e4bbf58afd484765f6d9ed0f30e796c81caffead66540
transaction
c9ea77895dbe17feff9d64ee881e27486014cb39e937202fd05af1453bf2498c
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30078
recomputing…
the chainentry 30078
sealed to the entry before
8c7c40f0e34781008ea837ee593f03df6bf6c1a251fb2e776310a7c23a8ed685
this leaf
0bcd2cc91f6090adb4fd6c607828f042782d723660109e5a30197279a6c7ec5c
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
lc7a//gCt72iw2TiIr0UZ3+7nDzteBa0NnnUAYIxMGRKBNF3HJThPevVW4SaVMhWZGXUz3u3Nkn3iTudG4LrAw==