why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GD66LX2QRDJ7M7LUR4MZSQEWGB3KTONDDT6EEV4LS2XN7MGQJ2CRI46N, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDV4RZV4LK5IWXQQSO7XAJTSCLOIIJN46RDT44G44HKFQMLSR6FGGQ5Z, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GDV4RZV4LK5IWXQQSO7XAJTSCLOIIJN46RDT44G44HKFQMLSR6FGGQ5Z is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- cd509803f18dcf5b42e933cad50d364319f6bec3a8413e1c0c56a6459ef58cd3
- request
- 3b01a0a42c2a417598a43d993f77c62fb4ecc86be124a5e97a7baba012ebbb17
- transaction
- 39286ea74e7108866e0b628ed0ecbffa326a37d739aaccb58a7e0296cb2765e8computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 73274
the chainentry 73274
- sealed to the entry before
- 3d9dc8d670ee257ecc04a2231e7dd8f22ff0baa738a7396b76f4ed3ba36c88f1
- this leaf
- 0bfeb9bd03e9b1604282291fff751148843c46a312608d02daedef67683d268d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 2Zn3XAAUx6w7iuDx5SnchC0ZdfxxcNeAf6IHDjsZ9LTpim1h84F1xfBwxFqfQ/Tg/f2bDVOQT3BzMThHlBxYBw==