livelog 42,869 entries · root 8a166a70ebe1 · read 17:40:34
the record/entry 41489
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDKQACB46BVSM7BNO6ZENDPWPRSX3GWWWDGZSPAI7TWZO3PM2JVIIT3B to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.985ms2026-09-09 16:00:03
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDKQACB46BVSM7BNO6ZENDPWPRSX3GWWWDGZSPAI7TWZO3PM2JVIIT3B to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
ec104d60029fe8396589016ab13d1bc9be48bd5f052f4dbd38f35210341de1f4
request
817b5cb8e85730ff3aa11a39677d4ff561b69e50c03d151b5e62842fbe1c3eb7
transaction
d820ff9d136ca008a324ad223dddec13d33a079fb716dd92b92099f488952f9a
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 41489
recomputing…
the chainentry 41489
sealed to the entry before
e7c7501277fb37c43c38bfe2baa5f8b02811e386d5a0f3e4a75bcb4d8cada517
this leaf
0d83bde06352668c1d5004241ef070d156e1f0b6bd3317a98206ba4ac8ae0fbb
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
PpZjhpDfvFwf221LtmwoJR1FgDbns45Zo3em8q+me9FRk0vHXOkPXCiDxbkr/rWnmF014PasxbRzoKqHH65QDg==