why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCFKO4S6M7GVPXMBJ4JKUZZ36IXPVFJCXORY2JOYNHRMD3H6B63JJ7Y3 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 42d3df7e98af0d0916f744312b9797577953e7134297810c1cdcea0a50e4fefc
- request
- 7d18a89546dbb3056bffc3a1a4464737c04c3649c61238ab6dcb47ad7384ee0a
- transaction
- fb081d0937f076f63a2f022e060b5ae1aa1c8a861fbf2e13b0d4faef4b3163c1computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 38570
the chainentry 38570
- sealed to the entry before
- 462642c8667d76fadd598eeeace8752fb933eba06932943545b4c980e2dbb409
- this leaf
- 0def93f5b5b1d505a3851b5eafc05e50d962b8816c485512b73bbd7a6c514604
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- M2bFRyeoI9cc9TxIL8QB7g86cmHfn0L3BnIvTBIWUJd5nVU7zm4xXimA/fW2FDtqRi3aNAMJftvCKPp24tzzAw==