why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBZYTT4PJHLJC7CGVE4A5MYV2QKWX53G3IMBOZALYC4ILBJ5UJLZMIVO, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 5284792cf9c55b07c1665b0850fb22d6705845cb07c9de51d3a80d5beba04dfb
- request
- c2ee9237315d0fa0e98a440aa832fd5c9bbfcab679ae568e34ac3497a87b882b
- transaction
- f6d614705c94d95c4e1f0db0060565cff249991b71e2922e67df5c369c6dc51acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 1108
the chainentry 1108
- sealed to the entry before
- 8c214f0d1b919b8d942c6a7e98581469098423d9634a33cc1a9727c9eaa56b7a
- this leaf
- 0e2d33d9fba165b0dad507916d10dd7ea2d394c412d0839231970223ec4d22a5
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Ur8qoMwYAUy7YZZtiY9zVDNX7xteMMl1lwVF5Drg6hK0+1j4jz4cTsz7Qx2R3iR3hjw8X5t7DDHD4muuRWQwBg==