livelog 51,860 entries · root 69af36d53ca2 · read 08:10:29
the record/entry 50089
DENY
refused before it reached the network
op 0 pays GCENG7B63YRM2DM3UE767DGDDYI3YO3YNJMMODPNBDF455K34NKCLKYM, which is not in the allowlist
decided in 7.822ms2026-09-16 05:34:39
why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed

op 0 pays GCENG7B63YRM2DM3UE767DGDDYI3YO3YNJMMODPNBDF455K34NKCLKYM, which is not in the allowlist

post_approval_integritydefinition_changed_since_approval

the tool or contract definition fingerprinted a3f1c0de9b7452e8 when the human approved and fingerprints 77b2e4901ac6df35 now. the approval covers something that no longer exists

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
089857da179ac7a662cda7e3caed7ee4c7663a9ce60eefeb56d8e2d213771626
request
b38f616ace16000f48da77604a5c1f27140bc762d31b8cd82071b032eafaf046
transaction
2c589cb417e979f94e16796b1b9d3bde6d5d36b6fcb15472c5d91b688efe6140
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50089
recomputing…
the chainentry 50089
sealed to the entry before
ba1afdf5fdee05a52a13e0850dc89e53902c5b8ea6d70e477c89d01b29f158fb
this leaf
0e4f03a225322a1d388e26ad04da3dd4092627f24e045e734cd76beec54e2344
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
ec+kDw0YSt/4iWBjvgshFtHhL1N75hjsmYTU+VmNhQk6mW0nRdIpZJPcmKV6nJVMGTClipsh63GEcUgjBlZKCQ==