livelog 16,111 entries · root d34b1a75670e · read 00:38:13
the record/entry 632
DENY
refused before it reached the network
op 0 pays GDLUSIMZV2SMLSZRIZR2XYRFAEEOPA6HAJBVRYGHGM4NFMO57ZZJRLAX, which is not in the allowlist
decided in 6.427ms2026-08-09 01:51:11
why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed

op 0 pays GDLUSIMZV2SMLSZRIZR2XYRFAEEOPA6HAJBVRYGHGM4NFMO57ZZJRLAX, which is not in the allowlist

counterpartycounterparty_denied

GDLUSIMZV2SMLSZRIZR2XYRFAEEOPA6HAJBVRYGHGM4NFMO57ZZJRLAX is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
54d60aeba8469fdfa0cefb9f97191380fb8224fbda7f8b1a6b16dba74e42cd28
request
ba291bc88efaa7683359a85e37f5963eec64f1958c36ef597ed25eb0ec8a0acd
transaction
346158e965317c5871f665380634cdbfb9e76870f00fbf8843b729ba8fbf9615
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 632
recomputing…
the chainentry 632
sealed to the entry before
224c87d9c43505837fd0fd6da7cbb1bc750a6e14ccc79a2ddbb69f0bc635981b
this leaf
0fad82459bf39051547fd7493aa7dce1fcc79679d445b6a436a907e9dce9c420
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
wlKfo/QaTt9+avAnm9z0LU9BcvGs5e0mgv3c7i8NMrxfsWqMgPRkH+K4cVp8bQYsayGJy017/hCOHMoUT9lzAw==