livelog 17,357 entries · root 465bb3bd717c · read 23:47:42
the record/entry 16852
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GC5IY6NOU2IIN4Z2FCV6GT5DKMBGBAWODPM4XX6VA3LX2W4VBMLIDVXW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.696ms2026-08-21 14:17:31
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GC5IY6NOU2IIN4Z2FCV6GT5DKMBGBAWODPM4XX6VA3LX2W4VBMLIDVXW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
e0608877504a959fd665e851a6ca4b25d76ca95031d30f55776e3c9ab1fd1615
request
5735b96ebeac46589144d917e340e69ade35591d06e5d0f917a3181499dd3584
transaction
6c31074bc28c3546cda060fd5c0c0835edc33ff7ce1133734ee7de6a4e2a5cc0
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 16852
recomputing…
the chainentry 16852
sealed to the entry before
5176813b85c806d459105432a1034ed5342a0e0ffbe11657770c0cbade3d3ee2
this leaf
0fd2b0c4af635a6a9775834e3c13a0890696653c198da27144737fbde9a94162
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
TgUubycsnXK+OEJ5FDXkymyen6Yfvx2YScgsjPw34d82qXlO1ej0xJB5XZK8sQ9nipuFcaBrk/KYpiwE4T7jBw==