livelog 35,710 entries · root 07899549d13b · read 04:22:43
the record/entry 35554
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBEH5NURB7TC5OPCLZU34ZLL6HHMB3THOCIFMPOYDNOU6ITE7QIN7QUM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.408ms2026-09-05 01:22:35
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBEH5NURB7TC5OPCLZU34ZLL6HHMB3THOCIFMPOYDNOU6ITE7QIN7QUM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
4878ec2ed8c81decbe5a331e9fd5ac24b85f95b27370d902161e7bb4673c9d66
request
9a9e598bf02806ab2ce07bad99483a25ef17b030e912401ff28457cae09ae29c
transaction
133a37e448b08c2f150c88407b954fa51f2af1fa4ad25b2f7af0dfbf2b414e27
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 35554
recomputing…
the chainentry 35554
sealed to the entry before
dfbff6ffb14aeabc3fc9edadc2534d998eb3cb771d957548d9ac3a9781d3b715
this leaf
10c22d480a9d2b8dad71485a1985e9cc39177ef437da939022551be52c14d09d
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
daStmR04KRXgcdtpJjt8enAJnf6jdyJidZjzP75D77ZcUBru75e/URalLjiZrOuinrVa6ExVDdVf5hZnkKk3Aw==