livelog 39,452 entries · root 3b7c48398580 · read 02:34:17
the record/entry 39315
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBRZREKBUTA353YGZRJUPH6EO5LFRT42V3UAVA4WYPSAXMZKFIRBC7EB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.041ms2026-09-08 00:03:54
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBRZREKBUTA353YGZRJUPH6EO5LFRT42V3UAVA4WYPSAXMZKFIRBC7EB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
61f2e68353a0a875c6d01bbb9b33b64c1b06be9669d5aa37092bfc22537caae2
request
288c6bac12e881601b79e7a6bd4589ad532f6c1b54e147f46f17d7e09bbb655d
transaction
803ce85d46fd1500557a0b326f09a144f11b8072c164af67ca254a3c32e0b03a
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 39315
recomputing…
the chainentry 39315
sealed to the entry before
9318245038ba05bcbeb52b202a6c6e8c219307f7256670835b5dd689e77e3c6e
this leaf
111a3db28675eb42444eb6a47449a562d5f99c030d05a863fc89dc7322d77aa7
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
0uVTydndH13nHlfbLj9K7YBAEWtpe7E2zJiOeJLlc7juJ6YUl2K26IADftxIfGdsm1utRgZSBdK6Okn0FHNdCQ==