why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GASOWQL2JIM2G4YGV5L3A7NFO7LOOFWF4F2UEISP274ZFEKOTOT54U2O, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GASOWQL2JIM2G4YGV5L3A7NFO7LOOFWF4F2UEISP274ZFEKOTOT54U2O is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- bd43ffc32e4aec178ab9e1db9d3e9552f6acb8320b850d9e826129f13f323d37
- request
- 289e6fb1bed8e2150e7ec31ac0f8c6753788ca045dbdc4463a602c905556fa56
- transaction
- 56bf5c4cc93c8bd369f54f476296f37f210d70c2749881c2289ee644568e5959computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 54109
the chainentry 54109
- sealed to the entry before
- b2d31892f93f104d7c52008cc383a3f974329f21a9191ed1f437d18e5c0cd3ac
- this leaf
- 111a643474a71a741aab805cabb20586c1ec25f5c13e717269c2aa3527872818
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- W6hmwdYTPa4uPjAISrBTpvz1/EVcrOI1H0SqFu7vJ/sf0xx6wqhnk7OEk9I4R71nDM7TzC2idKLTbsAiuTl2Bg==