why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDQQNAV2A5JFP4KKMRQGZRLGY7SS4R7Z3IR7JY4XDLMS26WLX3AVAT6X to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- ca3c92bf769795cb98525bde67d046486dc1e12ed8e3022197870042ffc44fb4
- request
- 06f7a0c6874d41af9a4f7625da98c1d5998f2006948a64ea52cc72067c9a59a0
- transaction
- 0132e192304443dad2da97bf090eafa2322e407481ca20f5c454ccf215b3042ccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 3948
the chainentry 3948
- sealed to the entry before
- c8de5be331cce40fe7bd9b95bd5b3d9c8ef645be37793dcd2473fe56c85d306b
- this leaf
- 1134f3a914ce0ad884aa07b4d76c318064ad9423833c3d998577e85b2f4f6864
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- KfzJKC/8P3Y0M9T2YXs7qgiiDVWzWcs5aq0pxo8hfvTRK3oFDBQmehLEnqGYpPghPcgRyW98uUktTZ+LpfaNAw==