livelog 39,342 entries · root 21b7ed901afb · read 00:39:01
the record/entry 39205
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBHOZS45EKPVPZUXIFSNQHYQLRDOGCTYFKCGPP5LPEXXTSJ6NM44TJMH to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.604ms2026-09-07 22:03:53
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBHOZS45EKPVPZUXIFSNQHYQLRDOGCTYFKCGPP5LPEXXTSJ6NM44TJMH to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
ac742f921e1246c6a1f969c5471b86731f36943607d951ac6d8086c1b28b770b
request
aca10dba512f7c6e427305ce12e71e83c9c5ae638beb448a6589667ecd082de4
transaction
358fa5551af6c15c69ddee00d10d78b49be43176c4c5be392c9debe08842d011
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 39205
recomputing…
the chainentry 39205
sealed to the entry before
e932451fd3b51fddad80555c92ca6e5eee419b504135492fa52fb4943253dccc
this leaf
130d12d86182fbd9b0d55ae2847e1eab8c2cc1b8fbb82d562c8b169445e8c091
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
CqpExoSEkT+XGxlOAUY6TvvXpmAi2/MRx098e5xt44xPMra9w7Dsg4aH/pIWALMR5pPDJjSwkiWN/vxkg9o3Cw==