why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAXRLPZUO3WICYQSDAAA3XEEKFGLXEESVOZXXBE6RFTNATWWDZ5T24JD to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 77732fd71916d1f7eb411d8d3a8475dfef12efcbfe270e2cf2c0df32e53fd502
- request
- 4ad90a4bf1c7ddae93b57fa7f9bd4f63c7a26555104c9c117b8964643cc567df
- transaction
- dcae1c0fdf126a19c4f7461ab970cc7960be616b6b1b858f1e27ba639797c6edcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 11702
the chainentry 11702
- sealed to the entry before
- 0b9553476393d0042a86ae1048a07becd09b7019856a1c7b957b720ffd2c694f
- this leaf
- 132e8f3e26f07ea7764d5d408716d060e455c3ea53a6bf19440e1e929ed4f15b
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Lfu09I2edc91SFfFsHLhIdhnyMb31wFFfvfgjKt1WiuHEl3kXjt5PRUZxHB17B3RTeLoa8wDwsLjGHtTMSV4BQ==