why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GD6LCC3LHTFJ2RCUJB2HX3HOD7E7MM4B5CFBLQTMWPXF7JWGS3TADMJB, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GD6LCC3LHTFJ2RCUJB2HX3HOD7E7MM4B5CFBLQTMWPXF7JWGS3TADMJB is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 6ac3bbdbb7ec76e0270d2ec379bfe55f498f23061d632b1dcbc92418bed65f0c
- request
- 7007397544d4160d351be4ae285063751c7c0288ec74a9d4eb663ac48df7e483
- transaction
- 8bfbc43b7c8343f47991d4959d47f52443bad6b78df8c0bd20b10a987d28b082computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 1551
the chainentry 1551
- sealed to the entry before
- ca2b842998d6c793107b220499d603546f5fc682c17bbaf8a47ede4d70c13e6a
- this leaf
- 134e19ecfabc0ee19aa10de8af2290436dfd146b0d36d30f220fb3a67b9a56e6
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- vROuqYuyr7wCD7a77ZmKeP6ZFcnvb3RF7AgzvOFQatpogWnnO6F5ZfE7PrC8MSg9E0VD0Gc2oQ/1JFOyNxnkAg==