why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBICV6NNC3N3VXEWPQ2PU2PL5DN6PNG6I24P2LXYUIZCJXPHUPHJ3C7N to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 29e4e87ef94c24e782d4f108e0c4663f1ac9f0615c000a59bbeddcdd30938333
- request
- c79590756fb8a15ccad9bb10c8c3ed9e5d2f1eef470f9528c65c9e816c423559
- transaction
- 2c57a29898882ca93876f2e408c3c4d0dd6d416cf521f92df91ae02380d73a39computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 66955
the chainentry 66955
- sealed to the entry before
- cb77d96f1da5c53ca1a6dd07e34cb309e3dd2ac74d50c7eef783eb54d8a1918b
- this leaf
- 13b47b3f4a80cc08ced1a4167078c8130413a62051841c1bc8dba71413049427
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- St3cPYds6+n54xGcJTrM3HhAvvEifED13L7kitnXpKt+5tDI8OdaWzfbDJIOp/+sEzvgp2VI3voHO75sMxlvAg==