why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAWYX7C4J7TWYDTOYV7ZP7F2ZRMEOC65XCCN7SBH54MRU3CIAAAAWTF7 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b12ce066b3daf5ef07b21a62ed7af180e69cbe721a1cdd0740d98268db2a63cf
- request
- ef33c7d66dce504c010db6b01dfcae20b2af439d5a3f99ab3a87c919a97036dd
- transaction
- bec4ffcee05a865caac389bd363a5e80d767b7e4603b594c26d78a9f0f925d68computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7500
the chainentry 7500
- sealed to the entry before
- 82ce3a227c65b287e0b6a44c770d7c19ace06819cf16ae7ddb70b48b975fda9d
- this leaf
- 1445e3193764bcb12db6113c5c9d97d1bb54c9aa560d749921000510c1bdda97
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- tVupLifcXK49SWlHDnK/q7X5Zr61o/eD92TNMjTtVGuPn/8HafdMcpNUrvH6BHVN0saQ6R2mLR/yRWi8UJltAQ==