why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GA5ILCJQEZKXDYLD5LU2L4OXFJPAF7M7JICQWA4HMARKWMQIC7JMCBJ2 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 75caaeeed6e8b809f45f4cde8183b345fdc56aa4449c7f1a27beab66ffd0f9be
- request
- 95274309b1e1b42a2d4d844ce6ae97326b36479f9ecffd20341ca5f4ba3e0c06
- transaction
- 3ff5d61470ed34b3e02ba14d4e3c4c87d75b390978acb7b4b1c61295ed6afd1dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57141
the chainentry 57141
- sealed to the entry before
- 8ed264095f64916c3ec1267a28ec7ac0b402f372a53077f1dbd8e4060ba59a68
- this leaf
- 167aed5b2db96a1042cee39d63ab1b6085b23863477fa3c575b36b45456f8e3c
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- S6dnnmq68oBwAul0pzmQyqT9TwFzVThhMUwOAMfsjIv4TQMtsO/KG13fauzY2tCLu1r+ixxBU7AiJXpmanx2Dg==