why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GC6TBGN52SYW5LV5RWDWVDXOH6ZVWIO2MEZDRR5T747O3O2FC5UFOLKB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 95d6754201ad1e0b8e7dfa5afdde1034d32a29309634e1f9ebe1ff05d68307c1
- request
- b6cb628217e8a0e68c89c7efb6f97cc1e1176d97b01401bcf8cc6680f02b7bd9
- transaction
- 852a796aa105c920dd7aa0e7155e054a4bd02329f2a09e816cdc371917bbf4d8computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 62750
the chainentry 62750
- sealed to the entry before
- 20e74f308f22d8953466ed4a87d4ad20be21c7c7eb9f87f581d264fffc88d191
- this leaf
- 16d9d391ef04ebdadd01c679a1c0ae3e2d4786748ee0a8e5f4c6fdbf8e06f0d1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- yKLi6p6H9Qd8N6jeCHHb1qp8b9R24QXNkhiJ/rVaVfo5qws5AsUfa07NTgnNaES/e33dtbKudL6YuD5HWqHQAw==