why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCHU7U4PWZJCPYZCR7JNB4JUHBY4Y7WKTY6JY2WTZSO3F5OMQ6VKRCJG, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCHU7U4PWZJCPYZCR7JNB4JUHBY4Y7WKTY6JY2WTZSO3F5OMQ6VKRCJG is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- bf1264a35d70e69b0637854a5f623c448b6dd1419610be77ca56421c6cf41bbb
- request
- 370f552094c362f9f6f01227d2716c8b203bebecc91fbf7c9de4a5f5ea748942
- transaction
- b5b3df40dd83c9835b48c1b8d00a4d79aa78846b12dffcf93bb3236681452b2ccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 71637
the chainentry 71637
- sealed to the entry before
- f62daf5329f784d74a6e29e12ab319a03c4af750a5215d3f107b60a9da0bf493
- this leaf
- 1778b21ddf06bf2553dd6b764c10142791ca689d31b7de181a8a32ead8603263
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- BR5E1X7UoqX65NJ2L02flibLNQ1BJtbqGit8LUfFQalx2NO4SxLL+dyN0xQDvPjVtNPctG9x3RuVn5GanAhHAw==