livelog 36,113 entries · root bd9523770b36 · read 12:12:54
the record/entry 35949
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDZOVCOWM5H6LI6R42KP4VNSBWDJN3CNRH7LKTETKBS52KJTIZIKAV35 to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.093ms2026-09-05 09:12:34
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDZOVCOWM5H6LI6R42KP4VNSBWDJN3CNRH7LKTETKBS52KJTIZIKAV35 to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
e6fab620962dc76d4c3120e2f90aeb6ca04cab225e26c38e34b4bc540b67a47e
request
3d729fbe39a0cc2439e71734f56693b5994c911f4445efc182b12491c2cd8715
transaction
e0faa423ab45595cc629b4a1c790eb1a5e7dc2269aac020d4fd6ed066250f2ea
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 35949
recomputing…
the chainentry 35949
sealed to the entry before
3015605890846fa99fc65506a18d3816ae427faa5097b5f3c5ab32ce0266e7d2
this leaf
17a981edcd4ad0ff17cf9da9e34739776cda79f56eb871858120a17ece99d9bb
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
yhdu58WFFcg6dp6wCD5Q8YrQdogmOOVwYSZpTGB3THLN9DUWIX8L3/Zsd/AcnoN3x1Zv3a0bpyzV3fQrgxoQCA==