why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GACPACHL4PV7NMPXJ56MNQKBM6NCDWKIJ34EEABNU2MWAS5IPUZV2IJ4, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GACPACHL4PV7NMPXJ56MNQKBM6NCDWKIJ34EEABNU2MWAS5IPUZV2IJ4 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 3a66ad020d47132746b6a1609e55270df4b2f4dd0b6fa9ed96289b11f8c7edaf
- request
- 0b3a9ec3ba954c67cd31a91c17231f20f0230e4d65120c7eeb658c22c3b85ce4
- transaction
- ce1e91e0260f34a7b4e57b61e76c50b833ec9c4ec513dfb062ed4afe3beadab9computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 10712
the chainentry 10712
- sealed to the entry before
- 44d10648f48bacc5650121af39cf7bfce68d97a311f8343b48f8664edff1a3df
- this leaf
- 1897062c62b76893f308c41441127cccd155d403d37352b033507b0b6739d6fc
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- zAQ7/qOowkMH21ZPPFavQZj4zhkaZBXUooiQNbMbsrG+N/gNMu0PcdCF4cNm3Nevbm4T2IDpRUIBcm/FXdWFBA==