why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDJJY4KE7YTWKSW3ETV5LYN5ROTXY7E4YDI5KFH7FJLT3ZSLDIUYDLF7 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 2bc846f8995c6558e362128b1507faf86ef3997680f56f30239569c892cc7f88
- request
- 21ffbc7b80b917c2178cf1229a100a38d0b48b746cafeeaa5526c683ffdae7f2
- transaction
- f2eca5720b69877cec4ea4421869d8ea22f6d36b3cd181bc476a7a955b80e53fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 23650
the chainentry 23650
- sealed to the entry before
- 79e04b51f5f303852d8f207126e8363197a9ce4ce982049da1b7aea8f228b14f
- this leaf
- 1961cbba1495aef256fea0d9adf614731105d58bdeb3846123dadd0507723293
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 3QPMHE76gsm7CWt8SXD1DrXDsVifMVHlfIskQmrzI76dBn3fLR6C6GTdffH73Hk96YgTxr9tWu+BvVji+rlTCg==