why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GC4OKZSFARJWVQYVCSQ3DJ2QTYSRYQY7XERTD72EVC76JMUXZ7TH7T62 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- df37ce43957135e686469428e2a30b421c0ae3051344d3a6a73f6cab4a85b19c
- request
- 5ea7b34906318cceded8a8e2a4fadfbab4b07182720d6ecfe908a8ad47f335f5
- transaction
- f1ff060d4d9491e613b84e3f80e3317a752affef7cc8dc1238b28a06a77e9fa8computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 54551
the chainentry 54551
- sealed to the entry before
- a2950ec5a47c13d198fec5810a52a9aed07ca3282c176b36f2a4c18c2490aec3
- this leaf
- 1a69044efffa0a81db15f9a5511af20019a6afb9695b649d0e42fad26b59af67
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Hy3gcU7mWqqLnaw9ZhtUZlrcEqgBQgTRN1UmBfzgwbmDNDrAMch7COJ0LvBFT1vEfAiLkMlXHjp033TlHwSDBQ==